Measured by 4 nodes on hardware we do not own, and signed by each of them. What machines here actually proved — never what the card claims.
matrix built 28 Jul 2026 · every field verified against the signature of the node that produced it, and re-verifiable by you: each signed figure carries the exact bytes the node signed (signing_payload_b64) and the signature over them, and the ed25519 public key is embedded in node_did. effective_ctx is the context length a node PROVED by recall, never the length a model card advertises
context declared1,31,072what the runtime reported. A node attests it was told this; nobody attests it is true.
context proved by recall8,192the largest size at which a machine could still find a token planted at the far end.
Advertises 16× the context any machine here could make it use.Not an accusation — it is what happened here, and it is signed.
This model calls tools correctly and does not stop. A node watched it call the probe tool, then call it again, until the turn budget ran out. Chosen on “supports tools” alone, it will call a tool in production and never come back.
How it was served — proved batch profiles
the same model advertises itself in different shapes, each one a machine proved
8 users, batchedhigh-throughput
4kcontext
25tok/s total
3.6tok/s · per user
8 replies decoding at once — the capacity this gram can actually serve a room.
did:epn:002408…9e3c79signed
6 users, batchedhigh-throughput
4kcontext
24tok/s total
4.7tok/s · per user
6 replies decoding at once — the capacity this gram can actually serve a room.
did:epn:002408…9e3c79signed
2 users, batchedgeneral
4kcontext
13tok/s total
7.2tok/s · per user
2 replies decoding at once — the capacity this gram can actually serve a room.
did:epn:002408…9e3c79signed
Single streaminteractive
4kcontext
8tok/s total
9.2tok/s · per user
One reply, streaming — the latency a single user sees.
did:epn:002408…9e3c79signed
4 users, batchedhigh-throughput
4kcontext
3tok/s total
7.0tok/s · per user
4 replies decoding at once — the capacity this gram can actually serve a room.
did:epn:002408…9e3c79 · q4_0 KVsigned
Capabilities, measured
✓Tool callingpassed
The node asked the model to call a function and checked whether it produced a valid call. Passing here is not the same as reasoning correctly over what the tools returned — a smaller model can do the first and fail the second silently.
✗Tool loop finishedprobed, and failed
Whether the conversation ENDED after the tool call, or the model kept calling until the turn budget ran out. Passing “tool calling” and failing this means the model will call a tool in production and never come back. A model chosen on the first flag alone is the reason an agent silently stops delivering work.
✓Visionpassed
Shown an image and asked what was in it. The node checked the answer.
✗Audioprobed, and failed
Given audio and asked to transcribe it.
✗Extended thinkingprobed, and failed
The model emits reasoning before its answer. Measured where the probe could observe it.
✓Structured outputpassed
Asked for JSON matching a schema, and got it. This is the difference between a model you can build on and one you must parse defensively.
signed by this network
What machines here proved
context proved by recall8,192
best throughput45.05 tok/s
machines that measured it4
samples behind those numbers4
regions it was proved in4
Every line traces to a node signature.
from the public record · unsigned
What the runtime says about it
context declared1,31,072
parameters5.1B
parameter count5,12,31,79,235
quantisationQ4_K_M
familygemma4
formatgguf
ollama /api/show; the node attests that the runtime reported these, not that they are true. Attested by did:epn:002408…9e3c79.The only unsigned block on this page. We attest we read these from the runtime — not that they are true. Nobody signs a model card.