/inference/hf.co-unsloth-qwen3-4b-gguf-iq1_s

hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3-4B-GGUF:IQ1_S

Measured by one node on hardware we do not own, and signed by each of them. What machines here actually proved — never what the card claims.

matrix built 25 Aug 2026 · every field verified against the signature of the node that produced it, and re-verifiable by you: each signed figure carries the exact bytes the node signed (signing_payload_b64) and the signature over them, and the ed25519 public key is embedded in node_did. effective_ctx is the context length a node PROVED by recall, never the length a model card advertises
context declarednot declaredwhat the runtime reported. A node attests it was told this; nobody attests it is true.
context proved by recallnot probedthe largest size at which a machine could still find tokens planted across the whole prompt — start, middle and end, all of which had to come back.
Both numbers are needed to state a gap, and one of them is missing.
signed by this network

What machines here proved

best throughput24.90 tok/s
machines that measured it1
samples behind those numbers1
regions it was proved in1
Every line traces to a node signature.
from the public record · unsigned

What the runtime says about it

No runtime metadata was attested for this model.The only unsigned block on this page. We attest we read these from the runtime — not that they are true. Nobody signs a model card.

Proven across regions

Patna, Bihar800001 · 1 node

The machine that measured it

nothing is averaged — the machine is what you are choosing
did:epn:002408…afbb8aPatna · 800001 · 25 Aug 2026
—ctx proved
24.90tok/s1 samples · 164s
no capability probed

Run this where your data already is

Tell us the workload, whose machines it should run on, and which jurisdiction it answers to.

Run a gramPut a machine on the network in this region; it signs its capacity into the room.Open a gramxStart your own room — an org, a community, a brand.Be invitedAccept a link from an admin to cross into the private room.